Ken Burns reflecting on His Latest War of Independence Film Series: ‘This Is Our Most Crucial Work’
The veteran filmmaker is now considered not just a filmmaker; he is a brand, a one-man industrial complex. Whenever he releases project premiering on the small screen, everybody wants an interview.
The filmmaker completed “countless podcast appearances”, he notes, nearing the end of his extensive publicity circuit featuring numerous locations, dozens of preview events and innumerable conversations. “I think there are 340.1m podcasts, one for every American, and I’ve done half of them.”
Fortunately Burns is a force of nature, as loquacious behind the mic as he is prolific during post-production. At seventy-two has traveled from historical sites to mainstream media outlets to discuss one of his most ambitious projects: his Revolutionary War documentary, an extensive six-episode, twelve-hour film project that consumed a substantial portion of his recent years and premiered recently through the public broadcasting service.
Timeless Filmmaking Method
Similar to traditional cooking in today’s rapid-consumption era, this documentary series intentionally classic, more redolent of traditional war documentaries rather than contemporary online content and podcast series.
But for Burns, who has built a career documenting American historical narratives covering diverse cultural topics, the revolutionary period transcends ordinary historical coverage but essential. “As I mentioned to directing partner Sarah Botstein the other day, and she agreed: no future work will carry greater importance,” Burns reflects during a telephone interview.
Massive Research Effort
Burns, co-directors Botstein and David Schmidt plus scripting partner Geoffrey Ward drew upon countless written sources and other historical materials. Numerous scholars, covering various ideological backgrounds, contributed scholarly insights along with leading scholars representing multiple disciplines like African American history, first nations scholarship and the British empire.
Distinctive Filmmaking Approach
The film’s approach will feel familiar to viewers of Burns’ earlier work. Its distinctive style included gradual camera movements through archival photographs, abundant historical musical selections with performers interpreting primary sources.
This period represented Burns built his legacy; years later, presently the respected veteran of historical films, he can apparently summon any actor he chooses. Participating with Burns at a New York gathering, acclaimed writer Lin-Manuel Miranda commented: “When Ken Burns calls, you say ‘Yes.’”
Extraordinary Talent
The decade-long production schedule provided advantages concerning availability. Sessions happened in studios, on location through digital platforms, an approach adopted throughout the health crisis. Burns explains the experience with performer Josh Brolin, who found a few free hours while in Georgia to record his lines portraying the founding father then continuing to other professional obligations.
The cast includes multiple distinguished artists, respected performing veterans, emerging and established stars, household names and rising talent, accomplished dramatic artists, international acting community, Edward Norton, David Oyelowo, Mandy Patinkin, television and film stars, and many others.
Burns emphasizes: “Frankly, this may be the best single cast gathered for any production. Their work is exceptional. They’re not picked because they’re celebrities. I became frustrated when someone asked, ‘So why the celebrities?’. I explained, ‘These are artists.’ They are among the world’s best performers and they animate historical material.”
Historical Complexity
Nevertheless, the lack of surviving participants, visual documentation required the filmmakers to depend substantially on the written word, integrating the first-person voices of multiple revolutionary participants. This allowed them to introduce audiences not just the famous founders of the revolution plus numerous additional who are seminal to the story”, numerous individuals lack visual representation.
Burns also indulged his particular enthusiasm for territorial understanding. “I have great affection for cartography,” he notes, “with greater cartographic content throughout this series versus earlier productions throughout my entire career.”
Global Significance
The team filmed across multiple important places throughout the continent and in London to capture the landscape’s character and worked extensively with re-enactors. All these elements combine to depict events more violent, complex and globally significant versus conventional understanding.
The film maintains, was no mere parochial quarrel over land, taxation and representation. Conversely, the project presents a violent confrontation that eventually involved more than two dozen nations and improbably came to embody what it calls “humanity’s highest ideals”.
Internal Conflict Truth
Initial complaints and protests leveled at London by far-flung British subjects in 13 fractious colonies rapidly became a bloody domestic struggle, pitting family members against each other and neighbour against neighbour. In episode two, scholar Alan Taylor notes: “The primary misunderstanding about the American Revolution centers on assuming it constituted that unified Americans. This omits the fact that Americans fought each other.”
Sophisticated Interpretation
According to his perspective, the independence account that “for most of us suffers from excessive romance and wistful remembrance and is incredibly superficial and doesn’t have the respect for what actually took place, every individual involved and the widespread bloodshed.”
Taylor maintains, an uprising that declared the world-changing idea of the unalienable rights of people; a brutal civil war, pitting Patriots against Loyalists; and a global war, another installment in a sequence of conflicts between Britain, France and Spain for control of the continent.
Uncertain Historical Outcomes
Burns also wanted {to rediscover the