🔗 Share this article

Initially, the former US president appeared to adopt a strong approach concerning Ukraine. After delivering statements of "severe ramifications" during the summer in case Russia's president continued blocking peace discussions, the former president finally enacted considerable restrictions on Russia's biggest oil companies, these major energy companies. This action significantly impacted the Russian leader's ability to support his military invasion in the region.

Yet, via his recently unveiled comprehensive peace plan for the conflict, reportedly drafted by both nations' officials excluding Ukraine's or EU involvement, Trump has seemingly returned to his Russia-friendly stance.

Favoring Invasion

The former president's initiative would essentially benefit the Russian leader for attacking Ukraine while placing Ukraine's democratic system in peril. Despite strong statements that "Ukraine's independence will be upheld", large portions of the proposal effectively compromise that essential sovereignty. What represents a Kremlin dream would probably be a Ukrainian nightmare.

Reflecting his corporate experience, the former president seems to treat the Ukrainian conflict as a simple border issue, as if handing Putin a part of Ukrainian soil will appease the leader. Yet, Russia's war is not simply about controlling a destroyed swath of economically weakened land in the Donbas region. It is about the nation's political system – and the Russian leader's obvious intention to eliminate it so it ceases to serves as an attractive standard for the Russia's population of the democratic government that his increasing autocracy prevents them.

Territorial Giveaways

Although maintaining in status the presently split oblasts of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, the proposal would compel the nation to surrender all of Donetsk region. Aside from favoring the Russian Federation with territory that its troops have been failed to occupy in over a ten years of warfare, this concession would leave Ukrainian defensive positions severely undermined.

The area is the place of Ukraine's well-known "fortress belt", the fortified protective structures that are a essential barrier to enemy progress. Trump would have the Ukrainian military abandon these defenses, giving Russian forces a open path to the capital if he later decide to resume the hostilities.

Armed Forces Restrictions

Then, in a step that would make renewed fighting simpler for Russia, the plan would force Ukraine to diminish the scale of its troops from their existing approximately 800,000 personnel to a maximum of this lower number. Significantly, Trump's proposal sets no such constraints on Russian forces.

In what appears as a concession to Russia's campaign to characterize the nation's democratically elected administration as extremists, Trump's plan asserts: "Every extremist doctrine and practices must be condemned and banned." Apparently to highlight this point, it demands that "The nation will hold elections in three months" of a truce. However, the proposal imposes no obligation that the Russian leader endanger his regime by allowing democratic processes in Russia.

Defense Guarantees

Admittedly, the initiative includes the Russian Federation commit not to "invade bordering nations" and to "enshrine in regulation its position of peaceful relations towards the EU and the Ukrainian people". But taking into account that Putin has violated similar agreements in the previous instances – for example the 1994 agreement, in which Russia pledged to recognize the nation's sovereignty in exchange for relinquishing its former Soviet nuclear weapons, and the 2014-2015 Minsk agreements, in which Moscow committed to a halt in fighting and a restoration of occupied land in the Donbas to the government – why should we have confidence in this commitment now?

This explains the Ukrainian government has been so determined on western defense commitments. Although the proposal promises a "immediate joint armed reaction" in case the Russian Federation renew its aggression, and provides that "Ukraine will receive reliable defense commitments", the details include unclear to concerning. The plan would not only prevent Ukraine accession to NATO but also prevent alliance nations from positioning troops on the nation's land, thus blocking the peacekeeping contingent, reportedly headed by Britain and France, on which Ukraine had been relying to stop Putin from replenishing his reduced military, re-equipping, and reinvading.

World Response

Another side agreement reportedly would provide Ukraine with a similar to NATO protection assurance, in which any future "major, intentional, and continuous military assault" by Russia on the country "shall be regarded as an attack jeopardizing the peace and security of the Western nations." This implies a defense action. Yet unlike a capable national defense – Ukraine's most reliable defense against future invasion – the credibility of the parallel accord would hinge on the dedication of alliance members, including the US administration, to respond with force to Putin's attacks, an action they have {not